Nonlinearity in Energy Demand Dynamics in Iran using a Smooth Transition Error-Correction Model (STECM)

Zahra Azizi, Ali Faridzad

Abstract


Growing energy consumption in Iran has raised concerns for future energy exports’ capacity. Effective policies should be identified for consumers’ responses. Since the possibility of nonlinearity in the dynamics of energy demand in existing literature is confirmed, and a linear estimation can be led to specification bias and wrong policies, this paper uses a new nonlinear model, Smooth Transition Error Correction Model (STECM), to examine the energy demand dynamics in Iran. The results of this study indicate that the error-correction term can have the role of the appropriate transition variable in this nonlinear error correction model. Based on the estimated model, two extreme regimes have been identified in the dynamics of energy demand in Iran. In the regime, with a high deviation from long-run equilibrium, the price and income elasticity of demand and the speed of adjustment are higher. But in the other regime which is related to near long-run equilibrium, the consumer’s incentive for reaction is less and so, the elasticities and the adjustment rate were small. The price elasticity of demand in both regimes is less than one, and therefore energy in Iran is inelastic. So, policymakers need to use non-price policies to manage energy demand.

Keywords


energy demand dynamics; non-linearity; smooth transition error correction model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhattacharyya S. 2011. Energy Economics: Concepts, Issues, Markets and Governance. Springer.

Uri N., 1994. The impact of measurment error in the data on estimations of the agricultural demand for electricity in the USA. Energy Economics 16(2): 121-131.

Huntington H., 2007. Industrial natural gas consumption in the United States: An empirical model for evaluating future trends. Energy Economics 29(4): 743-759.

Akinboade O., Ziramba E., and Kumo W., 2008. The demand for gasoline in South Africa: An empirical analysis using cointegration techniques. Energy Economics 30(6): 3222-3229.

Bernstein R. and R. Madlener. 2011. Residential natural gas demand elasticities in OECD countries: an ARDL bounds testing approach. FCN Working Paper, 1-29.

Lim K. and S. Yoo. 2016. Short-run and long-run elasticities of gasoline demand: The case of korea. Economics Planning and Policy 11(5): 391-395.

Zhang Y., Ji Q., and Fan Y., 2018. The price and income elasticity of china's natural gas demand: a multi-sectoral perspective. Energy Policy 113: 332-341.

Zarranezhad M. and F. Ghopanchi. 2007. Estimation of error correction model of demand for gasoline in Iran. Iranian Journal of Trade Studies 11(42): 29-52.

Mehrabi Boshrabadi H. and S. Naqavi., 2011. Estimating energy demand in agricultural sector of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches 3(10): 147-162.

Azerbaijani K., Sharifi A., and Shojaee A., 2009. ‬The estimation of compressed natural gas (CNG) application function in industry sector of Iran. Journal of Development and Capital 1(1): 47-70.

Omay T., Hasanov M., and Ucar N., 2014. Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from nonlinear panel cointegration and causality tests. Applied Econometrics 2(34).

Gabreyohannes E., 2010. A nonlinear approach to modelling the residential electricity consumption in Ethiopia. Energy Economics 32(3): 515-523.

Altinay G. and E. Karagol. 2004. Structural break, unit root, and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Economics 26(6): 985-994.

Lee C. and C. Chang. 2007. Energy Consumption and GDP revisited: A panel analysis of developed and developing countries. Energy Economics 29(6): 1206-1223.

Soytas U. and R. Sari. 2006. Can China contribute more to the fight against global warming? Journal of Policy Modeling 28(8): 837-846.

Wirl F., 1991. Energy demand and consumer price expectations: an empirical investigation of the consequences from the recent oil price collapse. Resources and Energy 13(3): 241-262.

Walker I. and F. Wirl. 1993. Irreversible Price-induced efficiency improvements: theory and empirical application to road transportation. The Energy Journal 14(4): 183-205.

Gately D., 1992. Imperfect price-reversibility of US gasoline demand: asymmetric responses to price increases and declines. Energy Journal 13: 179–207.

Balke N. and T. Fomby. 1997. Threshold cointegration. International Economic Review 38(3): 627-645.

Hu J. and C. Lin. 2008. Disaggregated energy consumption and GDP in Taiwan: a threshold cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 30(5): 2342-2358.

Lee C. and Y. Chiu. 2013. Modeling OECD Energy demand: An international panel smooth transition error-correction model. International Review of Economics and Finance 25: 372-383.

Kani A., Abbasspour M., and Abedi Z., 2013. Estimation of natural gas demand in industry sector of Iran: A nonlinear approach. International Journal of Economics and Finance 5(9): 148-155.

Nawaz S., Iqbal N., and Anwar S., 2014. Modelling electricity demand using the STAR (Smooth Transition Auto-Regressive) model in Pakistan. Energy 78: 535-542.

Teräsvirta T., 1994. Specification, Estimation and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical association 89: 208-218.

Luukkonen R., Saikkonen P., and Teräsvirta T. 1988. Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 75(3): 491-499.

Iranian Energy Balance Sheet Statistics. 2015. Retrieved from http://pep.moe.gov.ir/getdoc/aba3d7f5-fd66-425f-b488-cbb66fb12824/%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B2-92-(3).aspx

Li K. and B. Lin. 2014. The nonlinear impacts of industrial structure on China's energy intensity. Energy 69: 258-265.

Vogelsang T.J. and P. Perron. 1998. Additional tests for a unit root allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time. International Economic Review 39: 1073-1100.